“Besides Lee Lip Hong, the ex-principal of Pei Chun Public School, 43 other men were charged in court on Monday for having sex with a minor including 9 civil servants, a senior banker, a company director, a senior vice-president of a private company, lawyers, a senior police officer, as well as a scholarship recipient. Their ages range from between 21 to 48 years old. The men are accused of having sex with the same 16 year old student who was moonlighting as a freelance prostitute for the online vice syndicate busted by the police last year.
She was described as slim, 1.63m tall with C-cup breasts and weighs 48kg with the following ‘introduction’ on the porn website:
“(She) still has that naive girlishness, offers excellent sweet young thing, girlfriend experience…. Advance booking for (her) is required, don’t leave it to least minute booking as it always almost won’t work!”
She was reportedly so popular that some men paid to have sex with her more than three times. Her identity cannot be named as she is still considered a ‘juvenile’ under Singapore laws though she already slept with many men.
According to media reports, it was the pimp Tang Boon Thiew who sold the men out by revealing their particulars to the police. He has not been charged in court yet for any offences.” Source
“During the court session, lawyer Subhas Anandan took issue with the charge sheets.
“How is anybody going to know what he is charged for when you don’t know who the girl is, and what her age is? Who are they trying to protect? As far as I am concerned, this girl does not deserve protection as she is a HARDCORE PROSTITUTE who got so many men into trouble”
Mr Subhas said he would take the case all the way up to the High Court if the prosecution refuse to give him the particulars of the girl:
“We just can’t accept the word of the prosecution… We are going to ask the prosecution, the DPP, to give us further particulars. If they do not give us the further particulars, we will take it up in the High Court,” he said.
In an interview with the media, Mr Subhas described the girl as a HARDCORE prostitute who deserves no protection from the law. His comments were first aired on Channel 8 evening news yesterday, but was censored in subsequent news broadcasts.” Source
The truth hurts! Eminent Senior Counsel Subhas Anandan was pissed off in court when he represented those guys charged for paid sex crime with a minor. He is a fighter alright. He is outspoken and fortright. He is not wrong to say that his clients also got rights – the right to know who is that girl and what’s her age?
Under the law minors who are victims can’t be named. They are protected by law. Now who is the victim here? The 44 itchy monkeys or that little hardcore licentious imp? The law is blind. It cannot differentiate the obvious difference. Sometimes humans also follow blindly without thinking of the obvious.
There were great men in history such as Chairman Mao and Mahatma Gandhi having special sexual preferences and fetishes which are well known and documented. Yet those great historical figures are still revered till today. What about ancient times in China, India and the Romans & Greece all kinds of sexual exploits and fetishes were openly practiced.
Ah yes I heard you thinking that times have changed. We are living in a modern law abiding society.
Times have changed but still the timeless fascination with eroticism and karma-sutra remains part of human nature. Sex sells. There are tons of products in the open market to make women appear more attractive, slimmer, whiter and younger just as there also tons of products to increase men’s libido and prevent baldness etc all for the sole purpose of making opposites’ attraction. No? Still disagree?
Is paid commercial sex a crime? A young sexy girl openly advertises and offers commercial sex. Those men just took the bait. The only crime is that hardcore prostitute is under 18 yrs old. It is a crime to have sex with a prostitute under 18 yrs old.
Did that girl tell those men that she is under 18 yrs old? How would those men know that she was under 18 yrs old if she didn’t tell them? Is it written on her forehead to say that she’s underage?
In a court of law, only the evidence – whether it’s oral or physical evidence or case exhibits shall decide on the outcome of the case verdict. Maybe those men got a chance to defend themselves through Lawyer Subhus on their real ignorance of the “victim’s” underage status.
But that’s beside the point. The issue is all the 44 men are talented established figures in our society. Some of them are senior civil servants, police or army officers and business entrepreneurs. Why condemn them? Why hate them? They didn’t rape or molest any body’s sister, wife or mother.
They paid with their own money for some little fun and entertainment. Are they criminals who plunder and kill? Did they harm anybody? Who are we to play God and crucify them? Lynch them publicly? Could this be the work of MSM to divert us from serious issues of the day? Ponder over it.
If only they knew it. They would have gone to our neighbouring countries and frolic wantonly with all the sexy little girls money can buy for a song! Who is the victim here? The 44 itchy monkeys or that hardcore lascivious prostitute imp?
It’s an open secret that lots of our local men did just that. They cross over to neighbouring countries to get their sexual fetishes fixed then come back and pretend nothing happens. Remember it’s no offence if you are not caught. That is the rule of the game.
Senior Counsel Subhus Anandan has reasons to get angry. His comments on the case were later censored on state TV. We are a puritanical society where we can’t tolerate role models from the establishment paying for sex. If they are not school teachers or police or army officers then it’s ok.
We are perfect humans living in a sinless utopia. Is that so? It shows how shallow and naive are we. We are like frogs in a well. Just go to China, India, Europe or US. Look at the rich and famous hedonistic lifestyle. Our 44 itchy monkeys pales in comparison to them. We are making a mountain out of a molehill really. Maybe common folks just love to read scandalous juicy story especially involving those rich and powerful.
Dr Toothfully aka Yao mo gao chor ah? is correct to say that ‘if Gandhi were in the dock this time, we are sure to lose a great man‘ We live in a society full of ‘holy than thou’ hypocrites.
Like the typical Chinese saying ‘英雄難過美人關’ (ying xiong nan guo mei ren guan) – Even a hero finds it hard going against a beauty? English translation.
To those men out there – I say touch your heart and ask yourself if it’s true? Are you that holy? Remember if you are not caught either with a prostitute or somebody’s wife or lover etc, it’s no offence. Since nobody knows, you could throw stones at the 44 itchy monkeys on public display and behave like angels. But if you end up like one of the 44 itchy monkeys in court or the ‘2 civil servant itchy monkeys got mixed up with Cecilia the IT cobra’, I say good luck to you. Your career and your life is over. Your fate is sealed.
But our MP Teo Ser Luck defended that hardcore lascivious prostitute and felt sorry for her as a ‘victim.’ He may be the perfect gentleman and role model that those 44 itchy monkeys obviously can’t emulate. Let’s hope that he will remain that way forever.